 |
|
Information Box |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Hot News |
|
Parents As Partners
Presents a workshop on
Literacy and Reading
& Student Led IEP's and Transition
Please join us at
the Normal Community West High School Library
February 22, 2010 6:00 to 8:00 PM
Click here to view the workshop flyer
__________________
FileMaker
Click
on the link below to begin:
FileMaker |
| |
|
 |
 |
|
Information Box |
|
|
 |
|
|
Evaluation and Determination
of Eligibility
A. Definitions
1. Date of Referral: The date on which written
parental consent to complete an evaluation is obtained or
provided.
2. Domain: An aspect of a child’s functioning or
performance that must be considered in the course of
designing an evaluation. The domains are
health, vision, hearing, social and emotional status,
general intelligence, academic performance, communication
status, and motor abilities.
B. Procedures Upon Receipt of Referral
Upon receipt of a referral for a full and individual
evaluation, the Member District shall:
a. Obtain any required parental/guardian consent for
the full and individual evaluation;
b. Determine whether and to what extent, further
evaluation data is needed in each of the relevant domains
and from what sources that information should be obtained;
c. Advise evaluation team members of the referral and
the anticipated
completion date of all evaluation components; and
d. Coordinate a meeting to consider the results of the
completed evaluation(s).
C. Identification of Needed Assessments
1. An evaluation shall cover all domains, which are
relevant to the individual
student under consideration.
2. The following procedures shall be used for an
evaluation:
a. The IEP team members shall review and evaluate existing
information about the student, including the following if
available:
(1)
Information from a variety of formal and informal including
information provided by the student’s parent(s)/guardian(s);
(2)
Current classroom-based assessments and observations;
(3)
Observations by teachers and providers or related services;
(4)
Information, if any, provided by the student; and
(5)
Information from specialized evaluations such as those
performed by independent evaluators, medical evaluators,
behavioral intervention specialists, bilingual specialists,
etc.
b. The IEP team may conduct its
review without a meeting.
c. After review of the
information described above, the IEP team members shall
determine whether additional evaluation data is needed in
any relevant domain and from what source(s) to determine:
(1)
Whether the student has, or continues to have, one or more
of the disabling condition;
(2) The
present levels of performance and educational needs of the
student;
(3)
Whether the disability is adversely affecting the student’s
education;
(4)
Whether the student needs (or continues to need) special
education and related services; and
(5)
Whether any additions or modifications to the student’s
special education and related services are needed to enable
the student to meet the goals set out in his or her IEP and
to participate appropriately in the general curriculum.
d. If evaluation data is
needed, consent shall be obtained prior to conducting the
evaluation. After consent is obtained, qualified individuals
will complete the recommended assessments. At the time of
consent, the parent(s)/guardian(s) shall be provided a copy
of the notice of procedural safeguards.
e. After determining that
evaluation data is needed, the Member District must
administer or arrange for such tests and other evaluation
procedures as must be necessary to produce the necessary
information.
f. If evaluation data is
needed, the Member District will provide
written notice to the parent(s)/guardian(s) of:
(1) The
determination and the reasons for it; and
(2)
Advise the parent(s)/guardian(s) of their right to request
an assessment for the sole purpose of determining whether
the student is or continues to be eligible for special
education and related services.
g. Within 10 school days after
a parent/guardian requests an assessment to determine
whether the student is or continues to be eligible for
special education and related services as described in
(C)(2)(f) above, the Member District shall:
(1)
Notify the parent(s)/guardian(s) that it will conduct the
assessment and make the necessary arrangements, or
(2)
Request a due process hearing or notify the parent(s)/ guardian(s)
of his or her right to request a due process hearing.
D. Timeline for Convening the IEP Meeting
1. (105 ILCS 5/14-8.02 (b) (226.75) (226.110 d)
Within 60 school days from the date of referral and
obtaining written consent to conduct an evaluation, an IEP
meeting will be convened to consider the evaluation
information and, if the student is determined eligible, an
IEP must be developed.
2. (105 ILCS 5/14-8.02 (b) (226.110) If there are fewer
than 60 pupil attendance days remaining in the school year,
the evaluation will be completed and a meeting will be
convened prior to the first day of the next school year with
an IEP developed, as appropriate.
E. Evaluation Requirements
1. Before a student is evaluated, the school
district will determine student’s primary language or other
mode of communication and general cultural identification,
in accordance with the requirements of 23 Ill. Admin. Code
226.140.
2. Any recommended tests and other evaluation materials
will be:
a. Selected
and administered so as not to be discriminatory on a racial
or cultural basis;
b. Provided and administered in
the student's native language or other mode of
communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to do so;
c. Technically sound and
designed to assess specific aspect(s) of the student’s
functioning;
d. Administered by trained and
knowledgeable personnel and consistent with the instructions
provided by their publishers;
e. Validated for the specific
purposes for which it is used; and
f. Selected and administered so
as to ensure that if such instrument is provided to a
student with impaired sensory, motor or communication
skills, that the test results accurately reflect the level
of the student’s achievement and/or aptitude.
3. No single procedure and no single individual shall
be used as the sole criterion or evaluator to assess whether
or not a student has a disability or in determining
appropriate programming for the student. Tests and other
evaluation materials shall be tailored to assess specific
areas of educational need and may not be merely those that
are designed to provide a single general intelligence
quotient.
4. MVSEA and its Member Districts shall use assessment
tools and strategies that provide relevant information and
are sufficiently comprehensive to assist in identifying all
of the student’s needs for special education and related
services, whether commonly linked to the disability
according to which the student has been classified.
5. If the assessment is conducted under nonstandard
conditions, a description of the extent to which the
assessment varied from standard conditions shall be included
in the evaluation report.
6. Any individual conducting a component of an
evaluation shall meet the requirements set forth in 23 Ill.
Admin. Code 226.840.
7. If any portion of an evaluation cannot be completed
due to lack of parental/ guardian involvement, religious
convictions of the family, or inability of the student to
participate in an evaluation procedure, the Member District
shall note missing portions in the evaluation report and
state the reasons why such portions could not be completed.
F. Determination of Eligibility
1. No later than 60 school
days following the date of obtaining written consent to
conduct an evaluation (or prior to the first day of the next
school year if there are fewer than 60 pupil attendance days
remaining at the time consent if provided), an IEP meeting
will be convened to consider the results of the evaluation
and, if the student is determined to be eligible for special
education and related services, to develop an IEP.
2. The IEP team shall include the following individuals:
a. The parent(s)/guardian(s) of the
student;
b. A general education teacher if the
student is, or may participate in
the general education environment. For a student of less
than school age, an individual qualified to teach preschool
students;
c. A special education teacher;
d. A representative of the Member
District whom;
(1) Is qualified to
provide, to supervise the provision of, specially designed
instruction to meet the needs of students with disabilities;
(2) Is
knowledgeable about the general curriculum;
(3) Is
knowledgeable about the MVSEA and the Member District’s
resources; and
(4) Has the
authority to make commitments for the provision of resources
and is able to ensure that the services set out in the IEP
are implemented;
e. The IEP Team shall include an individual
who is qualified to interpret the instructional implications
of the evaluation results, who may be one of the individuals
listed above;
f. A representative of any other agency
that is likely to be responsible for providing or paying for
transition services, if the student is one for whom
transition services are to be planned;
g. The student, if age 18 years or older
and/or if a purpose of the IEP meeting is to plan for needed
transition services.
h. Other individuals with knowledge or
special expertise regarding the student, including providers
of related services; and
i. An individual qualified to
administer individual diagnostic evaluations of students if
the student is suspected of having a learning disability.
3. The IEP Team, after considering the evaluation and other
information available regarding the student, shall determine
whether the child is or continues to be eligible for special
education and related services as a student with a
disability as defined by federal and state law. In making
this determination, the IEP Team shall:
a. Draw upon information from a variety of
sources, including aptitude and achievement tests, parental
input, teacher recommendations, physical condition, social
or cultural background, and adaptive behavior;
b. Ensure that information obtained from
all of these sources is
documented and considered; and
c. Ensure that a psychological evaluation
has been conducted and a recommendation for eligibility has
been made by a school psychologist for all children
determined mentally impaired.
4. A student may not be determined eligible if the
determinant factor for that determination is lack of
instruction in reading or math or limited English
proficiency and the student does not otherwise meet the
Member District’s eligibility criteria.
5. A report of the IEP meeting will be prepared and contain
the following:
a. A description of the team’s
consideration of pre-existing information about the student,
all new evaluation results obtained, and any other
information relevant to the decision about the student’s
eligibility;
b. The date of the meeting;
c. The names, positions signatures of
the those in attendance at the meeting; and
d. Any separate written statement
provided by a participant who wishes to be on record as
disagreeing with the conclusions expressed in the team’s
report.
6. A copy of the IEP Team’s report, together with all
documentation upon which it is based, will be maintained in
the child’s temporary education record in accordance with
confidentiality requirements.
7. A copy of the completed document will be provided to
the parent(s)/guardian(s). If requested, a copy of any
evaluation reports will also be provided.
8. No later than 10 school days following the IEP
meeting, the parent(s)/ guardian(s) will be provided a
written notice of the determination of the team in
compliance with 23 Ill. Admin. Code 226.520. A copy of the
Notice of Procedural Safeguards will also be provided to the
parent(s)/guardian(s) no later than 10 school days following
the meeting.
G. Determination of a Learning Disability
1. An IEP team may determine that a student has a
specific learning disability if:
a. The student does not achieve
commensurate with his/her age and ability levels ability in
one or more of the following areas listed in subparagraph b,
of this Section, if provided with learning experiences
appropriate for the student’s age and ability levels; and
b. The team finds that the student
has a severe discrepancy between achievement and
intellectual ability in one or more of the following areas:
(1) Oral
expression.
(2) Listening
comprehension.
(3) Written
expression.
(4) Basic
reading skill.
(5) Reading
comprehension
(6)
Mathematics calculation.
(7)
Mathematics reasoning.
2. The team may not identify a student as having a specific
learning disability if the severe discrepancy between
ability and achievement is primarily the result of:
a. A visual, hearing, or motor
impairment;
b. Mental retardation;
c. Emotional disturbances; or
d. Environmental, cultural or
economic disadvantage.
3. At least one member other than the student's teacher must
observe the student’s academic performance in the regular
classroom setting. In the case of a student of less than
school age or out of school, a team member shall observe the
student in an environment appropriate for a student of that
age.
4. For a student suspected of having a specific learning
disability, the documentation of the team's determination of
eligibility must include a statement of:
a. Whether the student has a
specific learning disability;
b. The basis for making the
determination;
c. The relevant behavior noted
during the observation of the student;
d. The relationship of that
behavior to the student's academic functioning;
e. The educationally relevant
medical findings, if any;
f. Whether there is a severe
discrepancy between achievement and ability that is not
correctable without special education and related services;
and
g. The determination of the
team concerning the effects of environmental, cultural, or
economic disadvantage.
5. Each team member shall certify in writing whether the
report reflects his or her conclusion. If it does not
reflect his or her conclusion, the team member must submit a
separate statement presenting his or her conclusions.
H. Reevaluations
1. The Member District shall ensure that a
reevaluation of each student with a disability is conducted
whenever conditions warrant an evaluation or the child’s
parent(s)/guardian(s) or teacher requests a reevaluation,
but at least once every three years.
2. The Member District shall reevaluate an eligible student
before determining that he/she is no longer eligible for
special education and related services.
3. A reevaluation shall be conducted in accordance with
Subsections B-F of this Section.
I. Consideration of Privately Obtained
Evaluations
1. If the parent(s)/guardian(s) advises MVSEA or the Member
District that he/she/they have recently had the student
evaluated by an individual not employed by MVSEA or the
Member District, the Member District should:
a.
Request a copy of the evaluation report, if available, for
consideration by the IEP Team; and
b. Obtain parent(s)/guardian(s)
consent for a release of information from the private
evaluator.
2. Upon receipt of an evaluation report or a request by a
parent(s)/guardian(s) to convene an IEP meeting to consider
an outside evaluation, MVSEA or the Member District shall,
within 10 days, send written notice of an IEP meeting.
3. At the IEP meeting, MVSEA or the Member District shall
consider the results of the evaluation in any decision made
with respect to the student’s appropriate public education.
LEGAL REF.:
20 U.S.C. 1412 (State eligibility) 1412
(a)(7), 1413 (local
educational agency eligibility), 1413 (a)(1), 1414 (a)(b)(c).
34 C.F.R. 300.126, 220, 320, 321, 530-536, 540, 542.
105 ILCS 5/14-8.02 23 Ill. Admin. Code 226.75 (definitions),
226.110 (referral), 226.120 (identification of needed
assessments), 226.130 (evaluation requirements), 226.160
(determination of eligibility), 226.170 (criteria for
determining the existence of a specific learning
disability), 226.180 (independent educational evaluation),
226.210 (IEP team), 226.520 (notification of district’s
proposal), 226.840 (qualification of evaluators).
Click here to return to Mackinaw Valley Special Education
Policies and Procedures Page
|
|